"A Pioneer in Patient Medication
Education:
Still Exploring New Frontiers"
By Linda R. Bernstein,
PharmD
Medscape Pharmacists, 2001
Medscape interviews a
leader in pharmacy each month and publishes the interviews on
its Internet site. Consumer Health Information Corporation President
Dorothy L. Smith, Pharm.D., was the subject of Medscape's interview
in August 2001. The following is the transcript of that interview.
Dorothy
L. Smith, PharmD, is an author,
patient advocate, and expert in patient adherence with medications.
Her professional career has been devoted to developing programs
and materials for patients, employees, and consumers that give
them the information they need to make informed decisions about
their healthcare and medication use. She is founder and President
of Consumer Health Information Corporation,
which develops patient education programs to help bridge the
gap between health professionals, pharmaceutical companies,
and consumers.
Bernstein: What were
your goals and objectives over 20 years ago when you began writing
and designing patient education materials? Have they changed
over time?
Smith: I always tried
to keep my focus on the patient and to develop practical and
helpful information that will help patients understand how to
take their prescription drugs correctly. If healthcare professionals
will use the program, it is extremely important to me that these
programs not only be highly effective teaching aids but also
save the health professional time. I don't think my goals and
objectives have really changed over the past 20 years. What
has changed is the sophistication of our programs because of
the advances in patient adherence research, drug information
technology, and the Internet.
Bernstein: What influenced
your decision to take this career path and what hurdles did
you face?
Smith: I certainly
never intended to end up in publishing or start up a company.
I was trained as a hospital pharmacist with a specialty in ambulatory
care and drug information. During my residency program, I became
concerned that patients were coming to the pharmacy to pick
up their prescriptions but were not receiving the information
they needed in order to manage their medications correctly in
the home.
When I graduated, pharmacists
were trained not to counsel patients and to always refer
them to their physicians if they asked a question. This just
didn't make sense to me. As time went on, I saw patients come
back to the pharmacy suffering from needless side effects that
they could have managed at home. Many patients did not even
know which medication was treating which symptom or did not
understand the importance of following dosage instructions.
I saw patients hospitalized because they took 2 medications
that interacted and caused serious complications. I saw patients
stop taking their medications because they did not want to put
up with minor annoying side effects that they could have easily
managed at home. This [discontinuation of their meds] led to
serious complications, and some patients died.
When I saw patients die
because they had not been taught how to manage their medications
correctly, I decided I had 2 choices: leave pharmacy and go
into medicine or stay in pharmacy and try to make a change.
I decided to stay in pharmacy and do what I could to narrow
this serious communications gap and try to find a way to provide
patients with enough information so they could manage their
medications safely.
There were no courses in
pharmacy on how to counsel patients. So, I read every book on
medical interviewing I could find. I went to graduate school
and took courses on patient counseling and interviewing from
the schools of medicine and nursing. Patients were not used
to having a pharmacist counsel them. In fact, one patient thought
a "pharmacist" was a "lady farmer" and couldn't understand why
he needed to talk about his drugs with me!
The next hurdle was that
there were no reference books I could use in my patient interviews
that had translated the medical terminology about prescription
drugs into common, everyday language. I had to refer to at least
10 different books each time I counseled a patient on a medication
to gather the necessary clinical information. Then I had to
translate this medical terminology to lay language that patients
could understand.
One of the physicians I
was working with challenged me to take my crib notes that I
had developed for my patients and publish them as a reference
book for other doctors and pharmacists to use. That was the
start of a 7-year project that ended with the publication of
a textbook called Medication Guide for Patient Counseling.
It became the first textbook of its kind for pharmacists and
physicians.
Across the United States
and Canada, physicians and pharmacists told me they needed practical,
written sets of "patient-friendly" medication instructions because
they lacked the time to translate the professional information
into language for their patients. This led to the development
of the Patient Advisory Leaflet program that was used
in over 9000 community and chain pharmacies in the United States
and Canada. Physicians and pharmacists gave the 1-page leaflets
to patients when a medication was prescribed or dispensed.
Patients started writing
letters to the publisher requesting that these leaflets be printed
in a book they could use as a home reference. This led to a
series of Family Guides for consumers on medication instructions.
By 1983, I decided to take
a chance and founded Consumer Health Information Corporation.
The mass paperback, Understanding Prescription Drugs,
was published by Simon & Schuster; a Canadian version, Understanding
Canadian Prescription Drugs (Key Porter Books), followed.
It was surprising to me that approximately 30% of the drugs
in the United States and Canada have the same trade name but
require different patient instructions. Soon pharmaceutical
companies and health professional organizations were calling
for assistance in developing programs that would help patients
take their medications correctly and increase patient adherence.
Bernstein: What types
of decisions are patients making that are having an impact on
how effective prescription drugs can be?
Smith: The patient
holds the decision-making power once the medication has been
dispensed. The physician, nurse, and pharmacist have to rely
on the patient to make wise decisions in the home environment.
There are 3 critical decisions
made by the patient:
-
The patient decides
whether or not to fill the initial prescription.
-
The patient decides
whether or not to refill the prescription.
-
The patient decides
how and when to take the medicine and what to do if they think
they are developing a side effect.
Bernstein: What are
the important features to look for in evaluating the quality
of patient education materials?
Smith: Obviously,
the most important thing is that the information must be 100%
clinically accurate and translated into language that the average
consumer can understand.
Consumers also need "practical"
information that means something to them. Rather than giving
the person a long list of potential side effects, people need
to know the early warning signs of these side effects and how
to recognize them before they become severe. This takes clinical
expertise as well as skill in anticipating the most common questions
that patients ask regarding these side effects.
The next step is to recognize
the problems that patients will have during the prescribed treatment
and to develop practical strategies that will help them overcome
these barriers. Sometimes, it will be a problem related to the
dosage schedule. It may be a problem integrating the medicine
into their daily lifestyle. Other times, it will be a problem
relating to side effects. Many of these problems can be anticipated
in advance so that the patient can be prepared to handle them
if they occur. In addition, every person is different and will
need individual questions answered by their physician and pharmacist.
Last but not least is the
design and layout. Patient materials can contain wonderful information,
but if they are not easy to read and "patient-friendly," they
will be less effective. There are certain colors that should
be used to help motivate patients and there are other colors
that should not be used because they could make it difficult
for people with poor eyesight to read.
We spend a great deal of
time integrating the content with the design of the information.
Complicated medical illustrations are translated into graphics
that clearly and simply send the right message. It is certainly
true in patient education that a picture can be worth a thousand
words!
Since the patient is the
one who will be making critical decisions about when and how
to take their medications at home, it is essential that they
receive information that will provide them with straightforward
and easy-to-understand information. And patients need to store
this information at home so that if they start developing any
symptoms they think might be related to their medicines, they
can reread it and call their doctor or pharmacist.
Before any program is submitted
to a client, we review it very critically to make sure that
it is based on proven patient education principles from start
to finish.
Bernstein: How big
of a problem is medical literacy in this country? Are average
patients able to read the currently available patient package
inserts and labels?
Smith: Many people
in this country need information that is written at least at
the Grade 6 level. There are many other people who need the
information translated to the Grade 4 level. Since it is very
difficult to translate medical terminology to this level, there
are many health information Internet sites out there as well
as printed materials that are written at a higher readability
level. In fact, if you open a magazine and read some of the
ads for prescription drugs, you will find that many of them
are even written at the Grade 10 or Grade 12 level. Thus, fewer
people are going to be able to understand these materials.
But it's a far greater problem
than readability... patients must be able to "understand" the
information. For example, "red meat" is a word at the Grade
4 level, but many people do not understand it. If told to avoid
red meats on a low-cholesterol diet, many people think it is
okay to eat steaks and hamburgers because the meat is not red
once it is cooked! Information must be written so that people
can understand it.
In addition, I don't think
we should be expecting the consumer to be medically literate.
Health professionals have gone to schools and studied medical
terminology for years. It's not fair to expect a consumer to
be able to understand health information that is written at
a level that requires an understanding of medicine. I shall
always remember a professor telling me that one of the true
tests of a professional is to be able to simplify his/her professional
knowledge so that other people can understand the message. I
always encourage my students to put themselves in the shoes
of the patient and imagine what it would be like for them to
try to understand the procedure manual for the operational system
of a computer network system.
Bernstein: What other
factors contribute to medication misadventures?
Smith: I believe
that an even greater problem than medical literacy is the number
of patients who are suffering because they do not know how to
manage their medications correctly. In fact, hundreds of thousands
of people are ending up with severe medical complications and
some are even dying every year because they are not making wise
decisions when taking their prescription medicines.
When people make unwise
decisions about taking their prescription medicines, they can
run into serious problems. Not only does the medicine not have
a chance to work correctly, but the person's condition can worsen
as a result. For example, if someone has high blood pressure
and has no symptoms, it is very tempting to consider stopping
the medicine. Over time, the person's blood pressure would not
be controlled and the person may end up having a stroke or developing
congestive heart failure, kidney problems, etc. It would have
been much better to keep the blood pressure under control so
that these serious medical problems could possibly have been
prevented.
Home medication errors made
by patients cost them dearly in terms of quality of life as
well as healthcare costs. These errors also cost our healthcare
system significant dollars that could have been saved. Studies
have shown that it is costing our country more than $180 billion
a year to treat the complications of medication errors made
by patients -- and that does not include the employer costs
when employees miss work.[1] This is twice the figure it would
cost to purchase all the drugs in the country!
It doesn't make sense that
we are spending more on treating the complications of prescription
drug therapy than we are to purchase the medicines initially.
Other studies have shown that when patients are taught how to
manage their medicines correctly, these costs can be cut in
half.
Bernstein: How would
you improve upon the currently available patient medication
materials provided through drug and database companies?
Smith: This is a
very difficult question to answer because there is such wide
diversity among the various patient medication materials.
I would encourage the companies
to test their wording to make sure that patients will be able
to understand it and to make sure that the information is practical.
Every precaution needs to be taken to remove any chance of patient
misinterpretation, so that the patient is not harmed.
After the basic content
is developed, I would recommend that they integrate behavior
modification techniques in order to help convince the patient
to follow the instructions. It is the patients who have the
power in this whole process, and if they are not convinced that
the information is important, they will not take the drug correctly!
There are many patient education
techniques that can be applied to different diseases, drugs,
and patient populations. The key is to select the best techniques
so that they meet the needs of the people to whom you are giving
the information.
Bernstein: How would
you describe the "perfect" patient-pharmacist encounter? Obviously
just handing the patient a piece of paper with instructions
is not enough. What are the other components of patient education
that need to occur to optimize patient understanding?
Smith: I certainly
agree that just handing the patient a piece of paper with instructions
will never be enough. Written instructions should only be used
as reminder sheets because it is impossible for a person to
remember everything he or she is told about how to take the
prescribed medicine. They do serve a very useful purpose, though,
and people should re-read these sheets as they continue through
a course of therapy.
Far more important than
the written instructions is the personalized information that
the patient should receive from the pharmacist. I believe that
every person needs a "family pharmacist" whom he or she can
trust.
This pharmacist will keep
a confidential record of all the medications and counsel the
patient every time a prescription is dispensed. At the initial
prescription stage, the pharmacist will take a drug history
and help plan a dosage schedule that will "work" with the person's
lifestyle and work schedule. Helpful advice about how to manage
minor and commonly occurring side effects will be discussed,
and the pharmacist will also teach the patient the early warning
signs and appropriate actions for more serious adverse effects.
At each refill visit, the pharmacist will counsel the patient
and learn whether the patient has been having any problems remembering
to take the medication or whether he or she has experienced
any symptoms that might be related to adverse effects.
Bernstein: You are
a board member of the National Council on Patient Information
and Education. How does this organization work to improve medication
communication between patients and healthcare providers?
Smith: The National
Council on Patient Information and Education (NCPIE) is a coalition
of nearly 200 healthcare organizations representing healthcare
providers, consumers, university professors, and business groups
that develop patient information. It was formed almost 20 years
ago and is committed to safer, more effective medicine use through
better communication. The organization has been very active
in getting the message out that consumers need to ask questions
about their medicines so they know how to take them correctly.
NCPIE holds a conference every 2 years to bring together all
these members.
The organization encourages
consumers to learn about their medications before they start
taking them and to do the following:
-
Ask questions about
instructions for use, precautions, and side effects whenever
a new medicine is prescribed.
-
Share information with
doctors, pharmacists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals
about other prescription and OTC medicines they are taking.
-
Read carefully any written
information that comes with the medicine, and save it for
future reference.
(See www.talkaboutrx.org.)
Bernstein: What are
the limitations of currently available patient medication education
resources? Do you have any data on recent studies of the quality
of medical databases?
Smith: The first
problem is keeping the information up-to-date. We are currently
conducting a study and looking at the quality of several sources
of patient medication instructions on the Internet and are finding
that the databases vary significantly with regard to content
and how up-to-date they are.
Bernstein: What are
pharmaceutical companies doing to educate patients about their
products?
Smith: More and more
pharmaceutical companies are starting to develop well-designed
written information sheets in language the layperson can understand.
The government does not normally require a pharmaceutical company
to develop these instruction sheets, so most of the companies
that are developing them are doing so voluntarily. These medication
sheets are reviewed thoroughly by the US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) to make sure that the information is completely accurate
and that both the risks and the benefits are presented. Many
companies are also posting the patient package insert (PPI)
on their Web site for consumers to read. There will usually
be a date at the bottom of these instructions so you can tell
when it was last updated. The pharmaceutical company is required
to update its patient instructions whenever there is a pertinent
change in the drug labeling.
Pharmaceutical companies
are also realizing that patient adherence and patient retention
are linked. They are starting to see the importance of developing
a patient-adherence strategy for the specific medication rather
than just developing a variety of different types of patient
education materials.
Bernstein: What is
your company's approach to designing patient medication education
materials?
Smith: We try to
educate people about their medications and try to anticipate
all the problems that the patient might encounter by looking
at it from the patient's point of view.
Since health professionals
in their practice settings use many of our programs, it is also
critical that we look at the problems in hospitals, clinics,
and pharmacies from the health professional's point of view.
Then we stand back and identify the barriers that health professionals
encounter every day in their practices. This is when our years
of experience in clinical practice come into the picture. Health
professionals need programs that will help them teach the patient
in a minimum amount of time.
Once we have identified
the barriers faced by every person in the team (including the
patient), we develop a patient adherence strategy that will
help overcome these barriers at each stage of the prescription
drug therapy. We develop Personal Progress Logs for patients
that help them identify the things that can trigger their migraines
or allergies, etc. This is the creative and fun part of the
process. It's applying everything in medicine and pharmacy to
a creative program that will help patients receive the most
benefit from their medications.
It is absolutely essential
that we stay up-to-date with all the research on patient adherence,
behavior modification, the Transtheoretical Model of Change,
national policy issues, and new regulations that have an impact
on the legality of wording that is used. It is exciting to work
on medications while they are still in the research stages and
to develop programs in different languages for medicines all
over the world.
Bernstein: What projects
or goals do you have in mind for the future?
Smith: I have found
my work with the pharmaceutical companies to be a very professionally
rewarding experience. Pharmaceutical companies have realized
that they need high-quality patient education materials in order
for patients to respond effectively to their medications.
More and more companies
are realizing that it is in their best interests to develop
an FDA-approved patient package insert. We now have several
years of experience perfecting our procedures and working with
companies throughout the FDA regulatory review process. We will
definitely be expanding in this area. The development of a wide
variety of patient education/adherence programs will always
be a major emphasis. We have learned through the years how to
develop programs (ranging from DTC collateral materials to refill
adherence programs) that meet the needs of both health professionals
and their patients. The numbers rise if the written materials
are reinforced appropriately during personalized patient interviews.
I hope that I can get back
to updating some of the books I have written for consumers and
develop a newspaper column with practical information. I believe
that there is a real need for practical information and I have
always enjoyed working directly with consumers and the media.
We are working on developing an electronic patient medication
database based on my previous books as well as a series of publications
for children and caregivers. I am committed to working with
the national organizations on patient safety issues so that
consumers become better informed and take their medications
more safely. Hopefully, our academic training programs will
continue to expand and we can get more students interested in
this area as a future career.
Bernstein: What can
the pharmacist do to improve the quality of their patient medication
communications given the many obstacles they face?
Smith: Since time
is the major restriction that pharmacists face in their daily
practices, the key is the best use of that time. Pharmacists
need to delegate as many of the noncognitive tasks as possible
to their assistants so they are freed up to spend more time
with patients and monitoring their therapies.
The healthcare practitioner
needs to use strong patient communication techniques so that
patients can understand the information they are being given.
Second, the healthcare practitioner must be able to convince
and motivate the patient to follow the instructions. After all,
it is the patient who will decide whether or not to follow the
advice. Finally, the patient must trust the healthcare practitioner.
As soon as the patient trusts the healthcare provider, the patient
relationship becomes strong and your patient becomes one of
your strongest allies.
Bernstein: Describe
how you are trying to train the next generation of pharmacists
to be sensitive to patient education communication issues. How
can other pharmacists do the same?
Smith: Teaching remains
important to me. Even though we are a small company, I am committed
to helping pharmacy students pursue their interests in patient
education.
A few years ago we started
a Specialized Clerkship in Drug Information/Patient Education.
Depending on the specific university, the senior students spend
1-2 months with us and are involved in a wide variety of program
development and national policy issues. The program has expanded,
and we are currently affiliated with about 30 schools of pharmacy
across the United States.
Three years ago, we started
a Summer Internship Program for undergraduate pharmacy students
who have a keen interest in patient education, medical writing,
and student leadership. All of our students participate in actual
projects the company is working on. They also write an article
for their hometown newspaper. My hope is that some of these
students will decide to pursue a career in patient education
and help improve the home management of medications by patients.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Reference
Ernst FR, Grizzle AJ. Drug-related morbidity and mortality:
Updating the cost-of-illness model. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2001;41:192-199.
Available at: http://www.medscape.com/
APhA/JAPhA/2001/v41.n02/ jap4102.02.erns/jap4102.02.erns-01.phpl.
Linda R. Bernstein, PharmD,
is President of Vita Media Corporation, San Francisco, California.
She is a pharmacist, educator, media producer, writer, and on-air
talent specializing in the development of innovative educational
programs for health professionals and consumers. Email: vitamed@altavista.com.
|